Odekirk v. Austin
Arizona Supreme Court
366 P.2d 80 (1961)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Cleland P. Odekirk, a pedestrian (plaintiff), sued a driver (defendant) who hit and injured Odekirk with the driver’s car when Odekirk was inattentive and walking in the street with his back to oncoming traffic. The driver testified that he did not see Odekirk until an instant before striking him and that the driver immediately put on his brakes but could not stop his car in time. Odekirk alleged the driver was negligent, and the driver alleged that Odekirk was contributorily negligent. At trial, the jury returned a verdict for the driver, and Odekirk moved for a new trial. The trial court denied Odekirk’s new-trial motion, and Odekirk appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bernstein, Vice C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.