Olympia Hotels Corp. v. Johnson Wax Development Corp.

908 F.2d 1363 (1990)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Olympia Hotels Corp. v. Johnson Wax Development Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
908 F.2d 1363 (1990)

SC

Facts

Racine Hotel Partners (Racine) (defendant) hired Olympia Hotels Corporation (Olympia) (plaintiff) to build and operate a hotel. Olympia built the hotel, but it was not a successful business. Olympia brought suit against Racine, alleging breach of contract and civil conspiracy arising from Racine’s conduct after the contract was signed. Racine filed counterclaims for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. Racine’s counterclaim alleged that Olympia had not used its best efforts to make the hotel a success, as the contract required. The district court judge severed Racine’s counterclaim for fraudulent inducement. The district court held a trial on Olympia’s contract and conspiracy claims and Racine’s contract counterclaim. The judge directed a verdict for Olympia on Racine’s contract counterclaim, and directed a verdict for Racine on Olympia’s conspiracy claim. The jury returned a verdict for Olympia on its contract claim. Both parties appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Posner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership