ONY, Inc. v. Cornerstone Therapeutics, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
720 F.3d 490 (2013)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
ONY, Inc. (plaintiff), the manufacturer of one of three Food and Drug Administration-approved (FDA) surfactant drugs for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonatal infants, sued one of its competitors, Chiesi, and its distributor, Cornerstone Therapeutics, Inc., (defendants) for false advertising under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127. ONY alleged that Chiesi and Cornerstone issued a press release and distributed promotional materials touting the conclusions in an article published in a peer-reviewed medical journal reporting results of a Chiesi-sponsored study that concluded that Chiesi’s drug was associated with a lower mortality rate than either of its competitors’ drugs. ONY alleged that the study’s scientific methodology was flawed because it failed to mention any length-of-stay data, which it contended was intentional and selective distortion of the differences in the groups treated with the different drugs, and the study failed to cite articles with different conclusions. ONY also alleged that the circumstances surrounding the decision to publish the results of the study were unusual because one of the two peer-reviewers objected to its publication and the editor-in-chief broke the tie.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lynch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.