Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co. (U.K.) Ltd v. Rosseel, NV
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
609 F. Supp. 75 (1985)
- Written by Mary Katherine Cunningham, JD
Facts
Rosseel N.V. (Rosseel) (plaintiff) entered a contract to purchase oil from Oriental Commercial & Shipping Cp. (U.K.) Ltd. (Oriental U.K.) (defendant). As documented by a telex from Oriental U.K. to Rosseel, the contract contained an arbitration provision stating “Arbitration: If required in New York City.” According to Rosseel, the oil was never delivered by Oriental U.K. Rosseel served a Notice of Intent to Arbitrate upon Oriental U.K. and Oriental Commercial and Shipping Co., Ltd. (Oriental S.A.) (defendant). The Bokhari family owned both Oriental U.K. and Oriental S.A., though neither corporation owned shares of the other corporation. Oriental S.A. was not a signatory to the contract of sale between Oriental U.K. and Rosseel. Oriental S.A. responded with a petition to stay arbitration. Oriental S.A. argued that if the arbitration clause was enforceable, the arbitration clause was between Oriental U.K. and Rosseel only. Rosseel argued Oriental S.A. was bound to the arbitration agreement because Oriental U.K. is an alter ego of Oriental S.A.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Leisure, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.