Oster v. New England Hebrew Academy

2004 WL 5049677 (2004)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Oster v. New England Hebrew Academy

Massachusetts Superior Court
2004 WL 5049677 (2004)

AR

Facts

Oster (plaintiff) was executive secretary to the New England Hebrew Academy (defendant). Oster attempted to call an annual meeting of the Academy, but his action was not authorized by the Academy’s board of directors. The board cancelled the meeting, and the Central Committee of Chabad-Lubavitch Rabbis, which the Academy was part of, called Oster to appear before its rabbinical court. Oster replied that Oster might prefer to be heard before a different type of religious hearing as allowed under the organization’s rules. The Committee sent another notice to Oster that he had to appear before the rabbinical court. Oster sued in civil court, arguing that Oster had the option to choose what type of religious hearing that Oster would have.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership