From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...
Otteson v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
622 F.2d 516 (1980)
Stacey Otteson was a passenger in a jeep that slid on an icy road in the San Juan National Forest, located in Colorado. Otteson and the driver were killed after the jeep rolled down an embankment. The road was constructed and maintained by the United States government (government) (defendant) to facilitate timber harvesting. Otteson’s estate (Otteson) (plaintiff) brought a wrongful-death action against the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671 et seq. Otteson claimed that the government negligently failed to maintain the road free of ice, to warn of road hazards, and to close the road when it became unsafe. The government claimed immunity from the FTCA, arguing that road design and maintenance were discretionary functions and that Colorado’s sightseer statute, Colorado Revised Statutes §§ 33-41-101 et seq., applied to the government. The sightseer statute provided that private, rural landowners who allowed the public to access their land for recreation were liable only for the willful or malicious failure to guard or warn against known, dangerous conditions. The trial court found that the sightseer statute applied to the government, and that the government had not waived its immunity under the FTCA. Otteson appealed, arguing that the sightseer statute did not apply, because the government was in the position of a political subdivision rather than a private individual with respect to the duty to maintain public roads. Specifically, Otteson claimed that the government’s duty to maintain national forests as public recreational areas required the government to maintain forest roads for recreational use.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 551,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 551,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.