Palmer v. Colorado
Colorado Supreme Court
964 P.2d 524 (1998)
- Written by Caroline Milne, JD
Facts
Aaron Palmer (defendant) was convicted of conspiracy to commit reckless manslaughter, after firing a gun into a crowd. On appeal, Palmer argued that conspiracy to commit reckless manslaughter was not a cognizable crime. The problem, Palmer argued, was one of intent. The specific intent required for conspiracy could not be reconciled with the recklessness required for manslaughter. The court of appeals affirmed Palmer’s conviction and upheld conspiracy to commit reckless manslaughter as a cognizable crime. Palmer appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bender, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.