Palmer v. Hospital Authority

22 F.3d 1559 (1994)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Palmer v. Hospital Authority

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
22 F.3d 1559 (1994)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Paulette Palmer and her unborn child died during childbirth. Jerry Palmer (plaintiff), an Alabama citizen and Paulette’s husband, filed a lawsuit in federal district court against Hospital Authority of Randolph (the hospital) and John G. Bates (defendants), citizens of Georgia, alleging violations of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) and Georgia state law. Palmer was a citizen of Georgia for the purposes of the EMTALA claim and a citizen of Alabama for the purposes of the state-law claim. During the litigation, legal developments resulted in Palmer not having a cause of action against Bates under EMTALA. The district court dismissed all of Palmer’s claims against Bates, holding that it did not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the claims. Palmer appealed, arguing that the court had supplemental jurisdiction over the claims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Birch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership