Palmer v. Watson Construction Co.
Minnesota Supreme Court
121 N.W.2d 62 (1963)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Watson Construction Company (defendant), a general contractor, subcontracted a project’s excavation work to Ervin Palmer (plaintiff) and compensated Palmer with progress payments as the work proceeded. The payments stopped when Watson determined that Palmer had removed too much dirt, after which Palmer retaliated by ceasing work until such time as Watson resumed the payments. Watson did not budge from its position. Palmer sued Watson for breach of contract. The trial jury returned its verdict for Palmer and awarded him damages for work performed and lost profits. Watson appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court. As a threshold matter, the court ruled that the trial judge erroneously instructed the jury that Palmer was entitled to recover for lost profits.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sheran, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
