Palmore v. United States
United States Supreme Court
411 U.S. 389 (1973)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Palmore (defendant) was convicted of a felony under the District of Columbia Code. The trial court judge was employed under terms set by the District of Columbia Code, including a set term of office of 15 years and the possibility of removal or suspension by a judicial commission. Because Washington, D.C. was a federal territory, the District of Columbia Code was enacted by Congress. Palmore appealed his conviction, arguing that the trial court judge did not have authority to oversee a felony because he was not appointed pursuant to Article III of the United States Constitution. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed, and Palmore petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 790,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
