Pannone v. Grandmaison

1990 WL 265273 (1990)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pannone v. Grandmaison

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
1990 WL 265273 (1990)

Play video

Facts

Pannone (plaintiff) entered into negotiations to purchase a house owned by Grandmaison (defendant). The purchase agreement stated that Pannone’s offer to purchase the house was contingent on the “Purchaser’s approval” of the result of a home inspection, a termite inspection, and a radon gas inspection. Pannone is particularly sensitive to the effects of radon due to his exposure to radiation while serving in the United States Air Force in the Korean War. An inspection of Grandmaison’s home revealed radon was present but not in an abnormal level for homes within the state of Connecticut. Pannone found the presence of radon to be unacceptable, however, and informed Grandmaison he was canceling the sale. Grandmaison refused to return the $18,000 real estate deposit provided by Pannone. Pannone brought suit in Connecticut Superior Court against Grandmaison seeking the return of his deposit plus interest.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McWeeny, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership