Pannu v. Iolab Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
155 F.3d 1344, 47 U.S.P.Q.2d 1657 (1998)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Jaswant Pannu (plaintiff) held a patent that Pannu alleged had been infringed by Iolab Corp. (defendant). At trial in federal district court, it was established that another person, William Link, had contributed to Pannu’s invention. However, Link’s name had not been included in Pannu’s patent. Iolab moved for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) on the ground that improper authorship rendered the patent invalid. The court granted Iolab’s motion. Pannu appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lourie, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.