Parker v. Gladden
United States Supreme Court
385 U.S. 363 (1966)
- Written by Richard Lavigne, JD
Facts
Parker (defendant) was tried in the state of Oregon for second degree murder. During his trial, the bailiff who was assigned to watch over a jury sequestered for eight days expressed his opinion to certain jurors about Parker’s guilt. Parker was convicted by ten votes of a 12 person jury. Parker appealed on grounds that the bailiff’s comments had deprived him of a fair trial. Parker’s conviction was upheld through the state courts and he petitioned the United States Supreme Court for review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.