Parratt v. Taylor

451 U.S. 527 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Parratt v. Taylor

United States Supreme Court
451 U.S. 527 (1981)

Play video

Facts

Taylor (plaintiff), an inmate in a Nebraska prison, ordered hobby material valued at $23.50 by mail. The material was received at the prison, but was lost before it got to Taylor. Taylor sued the warden and another prison official (defendants) in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. The suit was brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for the value of the material lost due to the negligence of the defendants. Taylor claimed a violation of his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of Taylor, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit affirmed in a per curiam order. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)

Concurrence (Powell, J.)

Concurrence (Blackmun, J.)

Concurrence (Stewart, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership