Patti Hamond Shaw v. District of Columbia, et al.

944 F. Supp. 2d 43 (2013)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Patti Hamond Shaw v. District of Columbia, et al.

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
944 F. Supp. 2d 43 (2013)

  • Written by Haley Gintis, JD

Facts

Patti Hamond Shaw (plaintiff) obtained sex-reassignment surgery and legally changed her sex from male to female. Prior to changing her sex, Shaw was arrested by the Metropolitan Police Department (the department) and treated as a male detainee. After changing her sex, Shaw was arrested by the department two additional times. Despite the department’s knowledge of Shaw’s biological and legal sex change, Shaw was detained with male prisoners and endured sexual harassment while detained. Shaw’s confinement was in violation of the department’s policy requiring that all transgender detainees be placed in individual cells. However, the department did contact the United States Marshals Service (the service) to inform the service that a transgender individual was currently detained, as required by the department’s policy. Shaw was then transferred from the department’s custody to the service’s custody. The service also detained Shaw with male prisoners. Shaw endured additional harassment while detained with the service. Shaw sued the District of Columbia (the district) (defendant) in federal district court. Shaw alleged that the treatment she had received violated multiple federal and state laws and her constitutional rights. Among her allegations, Shaw argued that her due-process rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution had been violated. The district moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it had qualified immunity. The federal district court considered the motion.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Huvelle, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 825,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 990 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 825,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 990 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership