Pearson v. District Court

924 P.2d 512 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pearson v. District Court

Colorado Supreme Court
924 P.2d 512 (1996)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

Karen Sanders (plaintiff) and Scott Pearson (defendant) were married. In 1990, the marriage was dissolved, and Sanders was granted sole custody of their two children while Pearson was granted parenting time. In March 1995, Pearson filed a motion to modify his parenting time. On October 10, 1995, the trial court referred the dispute to mediation based on a state statute (the statute) that provided the court with authority to refer certain cases to mediation. On October 30, 1995, Sanders filed a motion to reconsider the mediation order based on an affidavit claiming that she had been physically and emotionally abused by Pearson during their marriage and that as a result of one injury-causing incident, Pearson had been convicted of assault and domestic violence. Sanders’s motion was denied. The Colorado Supreme Court reviewed the matter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scott, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership