Pearson v. State
Maryland Supreme Court
437 Md. 350, 86 A.3d 1232 (2014)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
Cervante Pearson (defendant) was charged with drug-related offenses. Pearson’s codefendant requested that the court ask during voir dire whether any prospective juror, any member of his family, a friend, or any acquaintance had been the victim of a crime. The trial court declined to ask the proposed question. Pearson was convicted. Affirming, the appellate court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to ask the proposed question. The Maryland Supreme Court granted Pearson’s petition for a writ of certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Watts, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

