Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Pelkey v. Norton

Maine Supreme Judicial Court
99 A.2d 918 (1953)


Facts

Pelkey (plaintiff), an automobile salesman, agreed to sell Norton (defendant) a 1951 Packard vehicle for $3,007.84. Norton paid $1,807.84 in cash and traded in a truck towards the purchase price for an amount of $1,200. At the time of their negotiation, Norton informed Pelkey that the truck was a 1949 Chevrolet truck in order to induce Pelkey to provide a greater trade-in amount. In reality, the truck was a 1947 Chevrolet model. To verify Norton’s claim that it was a 1949 model, the dealership looked at certain numbers and a serial letter from the impression on Norton’s truck. A mistake was made in reading the letter Q as O. If read correctly, the letter Q would have informed Pelkey that the truck was a 1947 model. The difference in the trade-in price between a 1947 model and 1949 model truck was about $700. When the truck was later sold to a third-party purchaser, it was discovered that the truck was a 1947 model. The third-party purchaser subsequently brought suit against Pelkey for damages. Pekley then brought suit against Norton for fraud. At the conclusion of Pelkey’s evidence at trial, Norton moved for a directed verdict, which was granted. Pelkey appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Tirrel, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.