Penney v. Association of Apartment Owners of Hale Kaanapali
Supreme Court of Hawaii
776 P.2d 393 (1989)
Robert C. Penney and P. Jean Penney (plaintiffs) owned an apartment in a condominium complex. Hale Kaanapali Hotel Associates (Hale) (defendant) was also an owner of a space in the same complex. A portion of the space in which they owned adjoined a common restroom, which was used by all of those patronizing businesses within the complex. Hale proposed an amendment to the complex declaration, seeking permission to obtain exclusive access to what is now the common bathroom. The amendment was approved by 76.83 percent of the interests held by all apartment owners in the complex. Penney then brought suit, arguing that because this new scheme would convert a common element of the property to a limited common element, a Hawaii statute required the unanimous consent of the apartment owners.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wakatsuki, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.