Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
P

Pennsylvania State Park Officers Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

854 A.2d 674 (2004)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pennsylvania State Park Officers Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court
854 A.2d 674 (2004)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Commonwealth) stopped paying police and park officers automatic longevity-based wage increases during a budgetary crisis in the summer of 2003. The Pennsylvania State Park Officers Association (PSPOA) and the Capitol Police Lodge 85, Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) (the unions) (plaintiffs) represented the officers under collective-bargaining agreements (CBAs) expiring June 30, 2003. The CBAs both provided for longevity wage increases. The parties failed to agree on new CBA terms and were in the arbitration process when the Commonwealth unilaterally stopped giving longevity increases. The unions filed unfair-labor-practice charges with the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (PLRB) (defendant) alleging the Commonwealth had unlawfully altered the status quo. The PLRB declined to issue a complaint and dismissed the unions’ exceptions to its decision. The unions appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Leavitt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Employment Law

Key Terms