Pennsylvania v. National Gettysburg Battlefield Tower, Inc.

454 Pa. 193, 311 A.2d 588 (1973)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pennsylvania v. National Gettysburg Battlefield Tower, Inc.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court
454 Pa. 193, 311 A.2d 588 (1973)

Facts

National Gettysburg Battlefield Tower, Inc. (the Tower Corporation) (defendant) planned to build a 307-foot tower near the Gettysburg Battlefield. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania) (plaintiff) brought suit in the Court of Common Pleas to enjoin construction of the tower, relying on the Pennsylvania Constitution as a basis for standing. Pennsylvania argued that the tower would spoil the natural and historic environment of the battlefield. The Tower Corporation argued that the tower was aesthetically pleasing and would provide educational value to visitors. The Court of Common Pleas determined that Pennsylvania had failed to show by clear and convincing proof that the tower’s construction would irreparably harm the environment at the proposed site. Pennsylvania appealed to the Commonwealth Court, which affirmed. Pennsylvania then appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (O’Brien, J.)

Concurrence (Roberts, J.)

Dissent (Jones, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership