Pension Committee v. Banc of America Securities

685 F. Supp. 2d 456 (2010)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pension Committee v. Banc of America Securities

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
685 F. Supp. 2d 456 (2010)

Facts

Shareholders (plaintiffs) in Lancer Offshore, Inc. and OmniFund Ltd. (the Funds) sued parties associated with the Funds (defendants) in February 2004 for damages resulting from liquidation of the Funds. After the Funds’ manager filed for bankruptcy in 2003, the Funds were held in receivership in Florida. The plaintiffs hired attorneys in November 2003. The lawyers indicated that production should be over-inclusive, but gave no standard litigation hold instructing the plaintiffs to preserve relevant information. In 2005, the action was transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Discovery began in 2007, and almost immediately the gaps in the plaintiffs’ document production became apparent. Some plaintiffs failed to institute a litigation hold, preserve documents, secure documents from key players, and supervise production. Plaintiffs also deleted electronic documents and made false declarations. Other plaintiffs belatedly instituted litigation holds or failed to instruct employees. The defendants moved to sanction the plaintiffs.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Scheindlin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership