Colorado Court of Appeals
629 P.2d 1098 (Col. App. 1981)
Frank Moore was shot several times and seriously injured. Winifred Mitchell Green (defendant) was charged with hiring someone to kill Moore. At trial, the prosecution introduced into evidence, over Green’s objection, testimony of Lela Mae Clark, Green’s sister-in-law, regarding an incident that had occurred at Clark’s house a few weeks after Moore was shot. Specifically, Clark stated that she heard Green’s wife yell at Green that “she wasn’t scared of him just . . . because he had Frank [Moore] shot.” According to Clark’s testimony, Green did not respond to the statement. Green was convicted of conspiracy to commit murder, attempted murder, and criminal solicitation. He appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kirshbaum, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.