Supreme Court of Michigan
461 N.W.2d 884 (1990)
In an undercover operation, a police officer obtained cocaine supplied by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and delivered the cocaine to a guard at a county jail. The jail guard, in exchange for money, delivered the cocaine to a juvenile inmate, Quinton Varner. Varner acted as an informant for the police and managed the bulk of the operation, including deciding which guards to target. Once the transaction was complete, the cocaine was returned to the authorities. Stephen Jamieson and other jail guards (defendants) were charged with the delivery of cocaine. The trial judge found as a matter of law that the defendants had been entrapped by the police, and dismissed the charges. The prosecution appealed. The court of appeals affirmed, and the Supreme Court of Michigan granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brickley, J.)
Dissent (Archer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.