People v. Lines
California Supreme Court
531 P.2d 793 (1975)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Richard Lee Lines (defendant) was charged with murder. On Lines’s motion, the trial court appointed Dr. Markman to evaluate Lines’s mental condition. The purpose of this examination was to assist Lines’s attorney in presenting his defense. Ultimately, Lines asserted an insanity defense. At this point, the trial court appointed other doctors, Dr. Bielinski and Dr. Tweed, to examine Lines. The court also reappointed Markman for that purpose. The prosecution (plaintiff) called Markman to testify at trial. Lines objected to Markman’s testimony based on the attorney-client privilege on the ground that Markman was originally an agent of Lines’s attorney. The trial court admitted the testimony, which was similar to that of Tweed, and convicted Lines. Lines appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Sullivan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
