Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

People v. Lovercamp

118 Cal. Rptr. 110 (1974)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,300+ case briefs...

People v. Lovercamp

California Courts of Appeal

118 Cal. Rptr. 110 (1974)

Facts

Ms. Lovercamp and Ms. Wynashe (defendants) were prisoners in the California penal system. Over a few months of incarceration, Lovercamp and Wynashe were continuously threatened by a group of other inmates who attempted to force them into sexual acts and attacked them if they refused. Lovercamp and Wynashe complained to the prison authorities to no avail. After again being attacked by approximately a dozen inmates and fighting with their attackers, Lovercamp and Wynashe feared for their lives, and felt they had no choice but to flee the prison. Lovercamp and Wynashe escaped and were quickly recaptured. After being charged with escape, Lovercamp and Wynashe attempted to enter an offer of proof that they had escaped out of necessity. The court rejected the offer of proof and convicted Lovercamp and Wynashe, who appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gardner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,300 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,300 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership