People v. Lubow
Court of Appeals of New York
272 N.E.2d 331 (1971)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Lubow and Gissinger (defendants) owed Max Silverman money. They proposed that Silverman obtain expensive jewelry on credit, that they then sell the jewelry and not pay back the creditors, and that the three then split the proceeds. Silverman reported this conversation to authorities and subsequently, he tape recorded a similar conversation implicating the defendants. The Criminal Court of the City of New York found the defendants guilty of solicitation to commit the felony of grand larceny. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bergan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 966,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.
