From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
People v. Lubow
Court of Appeals of New York
272 N.E.2d 331 (1971)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Lubow and Gissinger (defendants) owed Max Silverman money. They proposed that Silverman obtain expensive jewelry on credit, that they then sell the jewelry and not pay back the creditors, and that the three then split the proceeds. Silverman reported this conversation to authorities and subsequently, he tape recorded a similar conversation implicating the defendants. The Criminal Court of the City of New York found the defendants guilty of solicitation to commit the felony of grand larceny. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bergan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
