California Superior Court, Alameda County
Case No. 41266 (1968)
Newton (defendant) was indicted for murdering a white police officer. Newton is the co-founder and Minister of Defense of the Black Panther Party. The group is dedicated to ending police brutality against African Americans through organizing African American defense groups. Because of this, the case received much pre-trial publicity. Newton’s attorney is therefore concerned about securing an impartial jury. He extensively questions the potential jurors about whether they have already formed an opinion as to Newton’s guilt or innocence. As he goes back and forth with one potential juror, Newton’s attorney gets the man to admit that he understands that his opinion must be based on the evidence presented at trial. However, the man also admits that he does not believe in Newton’s innocence at the time of voir dire. Newton’s attorney challenges the man’s admission to the jury for cause.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.