California District Court of Appeal
330 P.2d 858 (Cal. Dist. Ct. App. 1958)
Elaine Wilson and her husband Calvert Wilson acquired a piece of real property as joint tenants. The record title of the property remained in them as joint tenants until Calvert died in 1955. In 1954, Elaine and Calvert divorced. Later that year, Calvert mortgaged his interest in the property to his parents Frank and Alice Wilson (defendants). In 1956, the People of the State of California (plaintiff) began condemnation proceedings against the property. Elaine asserted that she was the sole owner and was entitled to the entire proceeds from the condemnation. Calvert’s parents asserted that their mortgage should be satisfied from the proceeds. The trial court ruled that the mortgage should be paid out of the proceeds.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Nourse, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.