People v. Robinson

974 N.E.2d 978 (2012)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Robinson

Illinois Appellate Court
974 N.E.2d 978 (2012)

KL

Facts

Alfred D. Robinson (defendant) was charged with drug offenses. During plea negotiations, the state offered to recommend an eight-year sentence in exchange for Robinson’s guilty plea. Robinson’s attorney, Terry Dodds, communicated the offer to Robinson. Robinson responded by telling Dodds to ask the state whether it would recommend a seven-year sentence instead. If not, Robinson told Dodds to accept the state’s offer to recommend an eight-year sentence. Dodds refused to ask the state whether it would recommend a seven-year sentence, and Robinson and Dodds argued about Robinson’s refusal to accept the state’s offer without first asking whether the state would recommend a seven-year sentence. Robinson later stated that he wanted to accept the state’s offer of a plea bargain, but the offer had lapsed or been revoked by that time. Robinson was convicted by a jury and sentenced to 12 years in prison. Two years later, Robinson filed a postconviction petition alleging that Dodds rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to communicate to the state Robinson’s acceptance of the plea bargain. The state filed a motion to dismiss, which the trial court granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Steigmann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership