People v. Sanders
Illinois Supreme Court
696 N.E.2d 1144 (1998)
- Written by Erin Enser, JD
Facts
Robert Sanders (defendant) was charged by information with violation of the Illinois Hunter Interference Prohibition Act (the act). Specifically, Sanders was alleged to have interfered with the taking of a wild animal when he yelled at and photographed a hunter to dissuade her from killing a deer. Sanders moved to dismiss the charges, and the circuit court agreed on the ground that the statute was too vague and overbroad, in violation of the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The state (plaintiff) appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McMorrow, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Harrison, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.