People v. Seymour

536 P.3d 1260 (2023)

From our private database of 47,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Seymour

Colorado Supreme Court
536 P.3d 1260 (2023)

Facts

A house fire killed five people. After the initial investigation did not reveal any suspects, the police sought a reverse-keyword warrant. Investigators submitted detailed evidence to the judge supporting their belief that the perpetrators had likely entered the house’s address into Google’s search engine shortly before the crime. The judge issued a warrant allowing the police to hunt through Google’s databases for the internet-protocol (IP) addresses of users who had searched the target house’s address in the 15 days before the fire. This search returned five Colorado IP addresses. Further investigation linked one of those IP addresses to Gavin Seymour (defendant), who was later charged with arson and murder. Seymour moved to suppress all evidence resulting from the reverse-keyword warrant, arguing that it had lacked the constitutionally required particularity and probable cause. The trial court denied the suppression motion. The Colorado Supreme Court agreed to review the matter.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hood, J.)

Dissent (Marquez, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 918,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 918,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 1,000 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 918,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,300 briefs - keyed to 1,000 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership