People v. Sorge
New York Court of Appeals
93 N.E.2d 637 (1950)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Louise Sorge (defendant) was charged with the crime of abortion. On cross-examination at trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) asked Sorge about abortions she had previously performed on other people. Sorge denied this claim, which led the prosecution to ask follow-up questions about a prior instance when Sorge had pled guilty to performing an abortion and practicing medicine without a license. Sorge was convicted, and she appealed on the ground that the further questioning on other abortions was improper.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fuld, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.