People v. Stark

26 Cal. App. 4th 1179, 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 887 (1994)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

People v. Stark

California Court of Appeal
26 Cal. App. 4th 1179, 31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 887 (1994)

Play video

Facts

Rodney Stark (defendant), the owner of a construction company, entered into a contract with two doctors for the construction of a medical facility in 1989. The doctors obtained a construction loan that would make periodic payments to Stark to pay for materials and services required to complete the construction. After Stark received three draws from the construction loan, totaling approximately $245,000, the doctors discovered that Stark’s subcontractors were not receiving proper payment. Stark, who was in financial difficulty, admitted that he had used funds from the construction loan to support other, unrelated projects. Stark had diverted approximately $46,000, but claimed that he always intended to pay the money back into the doctors’ project. Stark was convicted for willful diversion of funds under California Penal Code (Penal Code) section 484b. Stark appealed on the ground that the jury had been wrongfully instructed that willful diversion was a general-intent crime.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Puglia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership