Peterson v. Jason

513 So. 2d 1351 (1987)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Peterson v. Jason

Florida District Court of Appeal
513 So. 2d 1351 (1987)

RW

Facts

William Peterson (plaintiff) and Brenda Carol Jason (defendant) divorced in 1985. The court awarded Jason custody of the couple’s child, ordered Peterson to pay child support, and gave Peterson visitation rights. In 1987, Peterson went back to court and moved for a reduction in his child-support obligation on the grounds that, due to his illness and job loss, he could no longer afford the payments. The court believed Peterson and cut his payments in half. However, the court also believed Jason’s testimony that Peterson rarely made his child-support payments. The court found Peterson to be in willful contempt of its 1985 child-support order and terminated Peterson’s visitation rights unless and until Peterson showed proof of his compliance with the new support-payment schedule. Peterson appealed the termination order to the Florida District Court of Appeal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mills, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership