Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. Rowe

429 F.3d 294 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. Rowe

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
429 F.3d 294 (2005)

Facts

To give Maine health-benefit providers more information to know whether their Pharmacy Benefit Mangers (PBMs) were acting against their interests and to help control costs and provide access to prescription drugs, the Maine legislature enacted the Unfair Prescription Drug Practices Act (UPDPA). The UPDPA imposed numerous requirements on PBMs entering contracts in Maine with certain entities that required the PBMs to act as fiduciaries for their clients and carry out certain duties like disgorging profits from self-dealing and disclosing conflicts of interest and financial arrangements with third parties. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association (PCMA) (plaintiff), a trade association for PBMs, challenged the UPDPA on several grounds in a suit against the Maine Attorney General, G. Steven Rowe (defendant). PCMA alleged the UPDPA infringed on free speech and violated Dormant Commerce Clause principles. The district court granted summary judgment for Rowe, and PCMA appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, J.)

Concurrence (Boudin, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership