Phelps v. Bd. of Supervisors of Muscatine
Supreme Court of Iowa
211 N.W.2d 274 (Iowa 1973)
Phelps (plaintiff) owns land that lies in the flood plain of the Cedar River within Muscatine County, Iowa. In 1963, Muscatine County (defendant) began construction of a bridge across the river near Phelps’ property. The river flooded in 1965, when the bridge was mostly complete, and again in 1969, after it was completed. Phelps’ land was naturally subject to flooding, but he claimed that the construction of the bridge had increased the degree of the flooding. He brought suit against the County, arguing that the increase in flooding was a taking that entitled him to compensation for the damage to his property. The trial court ruled against him, holding that there was no taking because there was no way of knowing when the river would next flood and how much damage the future floods would cause. Phelps appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.