Philadelphia Marine Trade Association-International Longshoremen’s Association Pension Fund v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
523 F.3d 140 (2008)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
The Philadelphia Marine Trade Association-International Longshoremen’s Association Vacation Fund (the fund) (plaintiff) collected and distributed payroll funds for certain employers. Under tax law, the fund was required to withhold taxes from those funds to pay to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant). The fund hired O’Neill Consulting Corporation (O’Neill) (plaintiff) to handle its tax matters. However, an O’Neill employee mishandled the taxes, causing the IRS to seize approximately $160,000 from one of the fund’s accounts. The employee then resigned without disclosing the mistake or seizure. A later audit eventually revealed the missing money, and the fund sought a refund from the IRS. The IRS refunded only part of the money. Because O’Neill’s employee had caused the loss, O’Neill indemnified the fund for it, meaning O’Neill reimbursed the fund for the missing amount. In exchange, the fund agreed to cooperate with O’Neill’s attempts to recover additional money from the IRS. O’Neill and the fund jointly sued the IRS, seeking a refund of the remaining seized account. The IRS moved to have O’Neill dismissed from the case, arguing that only the fund had any claim to a refund and that O’Neill lacked prudential standing to pursue the fund’s claim. The district dismissed O’Neill from the lawsuit and entered summary judgment for the IRS. The fund and O’Neill appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ambro, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.
