Philadelphia World Hockey Club v. Philadelphia Hockey Club
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
351 F.Supp. 462 (1972)
The World Hockey Association (plaintiff), including member team the Philadelphia World Hockey Club (WHL) (plaintiff), was struggling financially to survive. In order to attract talented hockey players, it often had to lure them away from their current National Hockey League (NHL) (defendant) team, like NHL team the Philadelphia Hockey Club (defendant). The WHL brought an antitrust suit against the NHL to secure a federal injunction barring the NHL and its teams from seeking state court injunctions which prevented more than 60 NHL players from moving to the WHL in violation of the standard NHL player contract. The district court granted the WHL’s request for an injunction and the NHL appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Higginbotham, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.