From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...
Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Nemours Foundation
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
865 F.2d 530 (3d Cir. 1988)
Nemours Foundation (Nemours) (plaintiff) hired Gilbane Building Company (Gilbane) to build the interior of a hospital. The contract stated that the agreement was under the following American Institute of Architects (AIA) guideline: “Nothing contained in the Contract Documents shall create any contractual relationship between the Owner [Nemours] or the Architect and any Subcontractor or Sub-subcontractor.” In addition, Exhibit A of the contract stated that Gilbane “shall have sole and total responsibility for completing the [general] contract . . . and is responsible to [Nemours] for the full, proper, and timely performance of all work under the contract.” Gilbane subcontracted with Pierce Associates, Inc. (Pierce) (defendant) to perform the mechanical work necessary for the interior of the hospital. Section 6 of the subcontract stated that Pierce “agrees to be bound to [Gilbane] by the terms and conditions of the Agreement . . . and to assume toward [Gilbane] all the obligations and responsibilities that [Gilbane], by these documents, assumes toward [Nemours].” The subcontract also incorporated the AIA guideline quoted above. Nemours approved the subcontract, stating in the approval letter “nothing herein shall be deemed or construed to create any contractual relationship between [Nemours] and said subcontractor.” During the project, a number of disputes between the parties arose and the project was eventually completed 21 months late. Nemours brought suit against Pierce on a third party beneficiary theory. The district court found in favor of Nemours. Pierce appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Debevoise, J.)
Dissent (Sloviter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 241,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.