Pierson v. Post
New York Court of Appeals
3 Cai. R. 175, 2 Am. Dec. 264 (1805)
- Written by Jamie Milne, JD
Facts
Lodowick Post (plaintiff) was hunting a fox, and Pierson (defendant), seeing this, captured and killed the same fox. Post brought a trespass suit against Pierson, claiming that Pierson had interfered with Post’s legal possession of the fox. The lower court held in Post’s favor, agreeing that pursuing the fox had given Post a property interest in the fox. Pierson appealed. [Editor’s Note: This case was decided by the New York Supreme Court. In modern times, that name refers to a trial court. However, the name referred to an appellate court at the time this case was decided. Consequently, the name of the modern equivalent is used in the case title.]
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tompkins, J.)
Dissent (Livingston, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 928,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,003 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.


