Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. Heard
Supreme Court of Georgia
405 S.E.2d 478 (1991)
- Written by Richard Lavigne, JD
Facts
Piggly Wiggly (defendant) entered into a commercial lease with the predecessor in interest of Heard (plaintiff). Piggly Wiggly built and operated a grocery store on the leased premises and exercised three options to renew the lease. One month after exercising the third renewal option, Piggly Wiggly closed its store on the leased property and relocated to a shopping mall. Piggly Wiggly would not agree to sublet the property to other interested grocery store tenants, and Heard sued for damages in breach of the lease on the grounds that the terms of the lease required that the property be continuously operated in the pursuit of a lawful business. The court of appeals concluded that the lease contained both an express and an implied covenant of continuous use and ruled in favor of Heard. Piggly Wiggly appealed to the supreme court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hunt, J.)
Dissent (Benham, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.