Pillois v. Billingsley
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
179 F.2d 205 (2d Cir. 1950)
Sherman Billingsley (defendant), the director of Cigogne, Inc., employed Raymond Pillois (plaintiff) to secure an exclusive representation contract covering territories in the Western Hemisphere from S.A. Le Galion perfumes. Billingsley agreed to pay Pillois an amount that Billingsley alone would deem reasonable. Pillois went to France and returned with a contract granting Cigogne, Inc. exclusive representation in the United States and other territories in the Western Hemisphere for a period of 99 years. Cigogne, Inc. accepted the contract but neither paid Pillois nor determined the reasonable value of Pillois’ services. Pillois brought suit to recover the reasonable value of his services. The trial court found that Pillois was entitled to recover $6,000.00. Billingsley appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chase, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 173,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.