Pine Island Farmers Coop v. Erstad & Riemer
Minnesota Supreme Court
649 N.W.2d 444 (2002)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Pine Island Farmers Coop (Pine Island) (plaintiff) was sued for negligently installing equipment at a dairy farm. Pine Island’s insurance company, Farmland Mutual Insurance Company (Farmland) (plaintiff), hired Erstad & Riemer, P.A. (Erstad) (defendant) to defend Pine Island in the lawsuit. Erstad dealt exclusively with Farmland for the first two months before ever contacting Pine Island. Erstad continued to consult with Farmland about legal strategy during the lawsuit. Eventually, the lawsuit settled for $1.05 million, with Pine Island paying a $10,000 deductible and Farmland paying the rest. After the settlement, Pine Island and Farmland learned that there was a clause in Pine Island’s contract with the dairy farm that provided a potentially crucial defense. However, Erstad had not read the contract during the lawsuit and never asserted this defense. Both Pine Island and Farmland sued Erstad for malpractice. The district court ruled that Erstad did not have an attorney-client relationship with Farmland and dismissed Farmland’s malpractice claim. The appellate court affirmed the ruling, and Farmland and Pine Island appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Page, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Gilbert, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.