Pippins v. KPMG LLP
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2011 WL 4701849 (2011)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Kyle Pippins (plaintiff) filed a federal class-action lawsuit against his former employer, KPMG LLP (defendant), alleging that KPMG had violated various federal and state employment laws. The district court had not yet certified the class of plaintiffs, but the class potentially consisted of 7,500 other former KPMG employees. Believing that the hard drives from each former employee’s KPMG-issued laptop could contain useful evidence, Pippins sought to have the drives preserved. KPMG moved for a protective order limiting its duty to preserve the drives. KPMG argued that the cost of preserving all 7,500 drives was disproportionate to the potential benefit. Pippins responded that total preservation was necessary unless KPMG could provide a meaningful sample of what was on the drives.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cott, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.