PKWare, Inc. v. Meade

79 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

PKWare, Inc. v. Meade

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
79 F. Supp. 2d 1007 (2000)

Play video

Facts

PKWare, Inc. (plaintiff) was a Milwaukee-based software company. Timothy Meade (defendant), an Ohio resident, contracted with PKWare to convert certain PKWare software; Meade would then send copies to PKWare and also retained the right to sell the software in exchange for royalty payments. The parties negotiated via phone and email, and Meade made one trip to Milwaukee. At contracting, Meade was a sole proprietor. He subsequently incorporated his business in Ohio under the name Ascent Solutions, Inc. (ASI) (defendant). ASI maintained a website and sold software worldwide, including to customers in Wisconsin. When the relationship between PKWare and Meade soured, PKWare sued Meade and ASI in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. PKWare asserted various state-law claims as well as federal trademark-, copyright-, and patent-infringement claims. Meade and ASI moved to dismiss for improper venue, among other things.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Adelman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership