Quimbee logo with url
From our private database of 14,300+ case briefs...

Plant v. Blazer Financial Services

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
598 F.2d 1357 (5th Cir. 1979)


Facts

Plant (plaintiff) executed a note in favor of Blazer (defendant) for $2,520 and later sued Blazer for failure to make disclosures required by the Truth-in-Lending Act. Blazer counterclaimed for the unpaid balance. The court found for Plant on the truth-in-lending claim and for Blazer on the counterclaim and offset Plant’s award accordingly. Plant appealed, alleging that the court lacked jurisdiction based either on diversity of citizenship or a federal question to decide the counterclaim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Roney, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 256,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,300 briefs, keyed to 191 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.