PLCM Group, Inc. v. Drexler
California Supreme Court
22 Cal. 4th 1084, 95 Cal. Rptr. 2d. 198, 997 P.2d 511 (2000)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
David Drexler (defendant) was an attorney. Drexler purchased professional malpractice insurance from PLCM Group, Inc. (PLCM) (plaintiff). The insurance policy contained a deductible of $20,000 and permitted PLCM to recover attorney fees if PLCM had to pursue litigation to recover the deductible amount. Drexler was sued for malpractice and submitted a claim to PLCM. A law firm was retained to represent Drexler, but Drexler failed to pay the full deductible amount. PLCM sued Drexler to recover $10,319.62. PLCM used its in-house counsel for the litigation. Drexler rejected settlement attempts and engaged in extensive discovery and motion practice. PLCM prevailed at trial and petitioned the trial court for attorney fees of $61,050. The fee amount was based on the prevailing hourly rate of $185 multiplied by the number of attorney hours expended, which is known as the lodestar calculation. Drexler argued that attorney fees for in-house counsel were not recoverable. The trial court awarded the full amount to PLCM. Drexler appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mosk, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Chin, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.