Polytop Corp. v. Chipsco, Inc.
Rhode Island Supreme Court
826 A.2d 945 (2003)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
Chipsco, Inc. (Chipsco) (defendant) was a manufacturer and seller of injection molds. In January 1999, Chipsco prepared a price quotation for Polytop Corporation (Polytop) (plaintiff) for a specific mold. The price quotation contained a mandatory arbitration provision. Polytop issued a purchase order three weeks later for the mold. Polytop’s purchase order stated that any additional or different terms proposed by Chipsco were rejected unless expressly assented to in writing. A second mold was also ordered with a similar price quotation and purchase order. Polytop sued Chipsco, alleging breach of contract for late delivery and poor quality of the molds. Chipsco moved to stay the proceedings in order to submit the dispute to arbitration. Polytop alleged that the arbitration provisions were not part of the contract. The trial court granted Chipsco’s motion, and Polytop appealed to the Rhode Island Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.