Polytop Corp. v. Chipsco, Inc.

826 A.2d 945 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Polytop Corp. v. Chipsco, Inc.

Rhode Island Supreme Court
826 A.2d 945 (2003)

JL
Play video

Facts

Chipsco, Inc. (Chipsco) (defendant) was a manufacturer and seller of injection molds. In January 1999, Chipsco prepared a price quotation for Polytop Corporation (Polytop) (plaintiff) for a specific mold. The price quotation contained a mandatory arbitration provision. Polytop issued a purchase order three weeks later for the mold. Polytop’s purchase order stated that any additional or different terms proposed by Chipsco were rejected unless expressly assented to in writing. A second mold was also ordered with a similar price quotation and purchase order. Polytop sued Chipsco, alleging breach of contract for late delivery and poor quality of the molds. Chipsco moved to stay the proceedings in order to submit the dispute to arbitration. Polytop alleged that the arbitration provisions were not part of the contract. The trial court granted Chipsco’s motion, and Polytop appealed to the Rhode Island Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 803,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership