Pontifex v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
226 F.2d 909 (1955)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
E. J. Pontifex (plaintiff) was using a pull-start lawnmower manufactured by Sears, Roebuck & Company (Sears) (defendant). The rope that was used to start the lawnmower struck Pontifex in the eye, injuring her. The rope was not affixed to a spring-recoil mechanism, as this type of mechanism was not in use when Pontifex’s lawnmower was manufactured. Spring-recoil mechanisms were used in newer lawnmowers manufactured after Pontifex’s injury. Pontifex brought suit, alleging that Sears was negligent for not designing Pontifex’s lawnmower with a spring-recoil mechanism. The district court directed a verdict for Sears. Pontifex appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.


